Priests of Science

 

Organised religion is a rather detestable thing and so are the people that give sermons on it.  These Christian preachers know there is no God; their main desire is to contrive this fraud, to conduce the naive to serve God.  At any one time in history, recent history, we can say the world is not as religious as it was ten-years ago, or perhaps the world was not as irrational as it was ten years ago. It is just another area of authoritarianism, a way of controlling, dominating and manipulating young people.  It also helps the state’s cause to monitor these people.  If these followers of this perverse religion follow the principles of the Bible, they have no principles of their own, and therefore authorities will cherish them for they need not read their subversive minds; their thoughts and beliefs have all been written down in a book!

These priests, these vicars think they are scientists, men of science, men of rationality, of reasoning, of enlightenment; this is the new trend with these men of God.  Why do this?  The answer is rather easy: in 1859, Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species appeared in print for the first time, it scandalised the church and destroyed its irrational and deranged notions of supernatural absurdities.  Ever since then new creative ideas have been expressed by the church.  They have come up with such imbecilic nonsense like “God created evolution”.  If every man and woman were asked to write his or her top thousand most ludicrous things, it would not surpass this in its idiocy.  These men of God call themselves reasonable; there is no reason behind this blatant stupidity.

The Old Testament is perhaps the most bloodthirsty book, or rather, series of bloodthirsty books ever written.  Actually, no other book or series of books comes close to the violence and terror we see in the Old Testament.  Charles Darwin comes along and introduces a new “theory” on the evolution of man, in fact it is no longer considered a theory, indeed it is more than that; it is factual.  Yet these priests of science still argue these absurdities.  Let us, as reasonable and rational people, ask these priests of science some questions.  Did God create man? Moreover, for that matter, woman too?  God created man but not jellyfish, dinosaurs, elephants and tigers.  That is totally implausible.  For it is clear man evolved from other life forms, thus disproving the existence of the Christian God, Jehovah.

This is the status quo.  Therefore, these men of science have to create another web of lies to control and manipulate the population.  “We do not take the Old Testament literally anymore”, so they say.  They have to think up of new ways to con people, this is when they become priests of science; they attempt to integrate science and Darwinism into the Bible.  Whoever heard of such a thing?  God created man, yet the earth is only six-thousand years old.  Can a single rational person believe this is possible in the modern world?  It is possible, and more.  Well over one billion people believe in this absurdity; one billion! Perhaps this should be incorporated in the Theatre of the Absurd. 

It is not even about God anymore.  They, these priests of science, like to set certain rules or principles on the naive and gullible, those that have lost hope, and those that have problems with their own existence.  They like to instruct them on morality, abortion, the holy land, marriage, the evils of homosexuals and homosexuality, family values and so on. 
 

Morality

 

This is what we are told is Christian morality.  Forcing a set of values upon “the bewildered herd”, to borrow a phrase from Walter Lippmann.  “Love thy neighbour”, “murder is a sin” and so on, yet the God almighty himself is immune from these principles.  As is well known, God, in the Old Testament, drowned the whole of humanity-apart from a few fortunates-the entirety of civilisation were wiped out because of God’s genocidal whims, yet these priests utter patent garbage saying “murder is wrong”, well condemn your God to begin with.  Christian moralists condemn bad behaviour; they condemn violence, bad language and nudity in cinema and elsewhere. They teach the youngsters and the impressionable about hell, the Devil and eternal damnation. 

This is nothing more than child abuse, and these priests of science know as much.  If your child has the temerity to think of God and myths surrounding him, if your child has the capacity to think independently and not to think of religion and the gods, if your child can cast away base ideas represented in the Bible, these priests of science must whip them into frenzy.  They will scare the life out of these children; have them believe they are going to the lowest and the darkest pits of hell, more hellish than Dante paints in his Divine Comedy.  Their desire to instil ultimate fear into the child until they succumb will never stop being tormented by these priests of science.  This is how these men induce people to join their perverse organisation.  This is why there are so many Christians in the world.  There are so many because of the manipulative practices that are used.  Threats of terror, fear and eternal damnation just being some of them. 

Abortion

All human life is sacred, they tell us.  Yet, what they do fail to tell us is that God does not hold all life to be sacred.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  God, as we have already seen, was happy to destroy almost the entirety of humanity.  Nevertheless, these priests of science still maintain all life is sacred.  Therefore, these men would prefer women give birth to a baby she was adamant she did not want.  Perhaps she was a victim of rape, or worse: child abuse.  No matter, these priests of science care little about that.  In fact, they are often the abusers of these children themselves.  However, women must not have abortions, no matter what!  It is possible the mother is a drug addict; the father a brute and a drunk.  No matter, these priests of science care little for such things.  They would prefer the child to suffer, suffer at the hands of useless and worthless parents, because, of course, they care nothing for the child, they just care for the Bible, which, no doubt, they masturbate over each night, that is if they do not spend their time abusing children.

Yet these priests of science still speak of morality, virtue and other things they claim they possess.  “Abortion is wrong and child abuse is wrong unless we do the abusing”.  This is their logic, and quite a perverse logic it is too.  Yet how can this be justified? To tell these women with low levels of self-esteem, who have no confidence whatsoever in themselves, with little hope, that they must give birth to a child they utterly despise.  This is where the priests of science come in.  They bring the most desperate, impoverished and disadvantaged in society and force their obscene views on them, and think nothing of it.  These Christians will do as you instruct them; the horrors at Waco tell us as much.  Telling grown women they must not have an abortion is wicked; it is totally outrageous.  Yet in modern society, people think nothing of it.  People leave these priests of science to it.  Is it sensible that a failed state should be a parent to another?  Surely if this was the case, the state would be as bad, if not worse, than the parent. 

The Holy Land

Go to Israel and see these ultra-orthodox Jews applaud the subjugation of Gazans and what do some of these religious lunatics say? Let God decide, while the state of Israel extends their territories further and further and inevitably, their bombings.  They call it the “Jewish state”, plenty of pleasantries for the Jews and for people who pretend to be Jewish but misery for everybody else.  This is what the state of Israel calls “liberal democracy”.  There is more democracy for women in Saudi Arabia, and they are amongst the most oppressed in the world.  It is the “holy land”, and people continue to utter this two-word phrase.  It should not be uttered; it ought to be abolished immediately.  By calling it the “holy land” is every justification for the state terrorists in Israel to murder, rape and torture with impunity. 
 

The word “holy land” is used so often that people say it without even realising.  Yet these priests of science, who go on about helping those who need it, helping the poor, the forgotten, the homeless, well this is just untrue.  They do not always help these people, and it is a scandal they do not, they seldom speak out about the collective punishment of the Palestinians who are subject to the most terrible abuse, these are the forgotten, the homeless, and the foreigners in their own land.  They are, what Orwell may call unpeople.  They do not exist; their suffering is of no concern to these priests of science.  Yet, despite this, they still preach about Christian morality.  What is often disgraceful about their conduct is that they side with the aggressor, with the terrorists, with the lunatics who bomb sleeping children, and why?  It is nothing more than that perverse word, “religion”, “Jesus” and the “holy land”.  It ought to be the church's responsibility to speak out for people all over the world. 

Marriage and Family Values

Priests of science are forever prattling on about family values, yet these men do not speak of the church’s values.  What are the church’s values?  “Thou must discriminate against homosexuals”, “thou must abuse children”, and the most important one: “you must do as we say”.  Typically, the family must be in chains and cut off from any sort of independent thinking whatsoever, for they must be Christians who bring up their children in the Christian tradition.  It is perfectly acceptable, so we are told, to bring up your children as Christians, but what about the atheist tradition, the Marxist tradition, the existentialist tradition, or perhaps the postmodernist position.  They speak of Christian values, of parents sending their children to faith schools in order to be brainwashed.  Suppressing and oppressing women as the church always has done, and always will.  How many female popes can we name, how many archbishops, how many cardinals?

These priests should be the last people in the world to lecture on family values and marriage.  Yes, the Christian church says you may get married, but gay marriage is forbidden because of homophobic fanatics.  Some of these priests of science even forgive homosexuals for taking part on this illicit activity; how courageous of them, how noble, how benevolent.  Right Wing politicians in the United States often speak of homosexuals being “cured”, yet nobody speaks of their deranged ideologies being cured, their distorted thinking, their belligerence for abolishing the welfare state, or wanting to, for privatising public services, nationalising terrorism and so forth.  If people want to believe they have freedoms, that is all fine and good.  Nevertheless, these Christian moralists cannot even say as much.  They are controlled by priests of science.  They must adopt these so-called family values and strict rules on marriage.  Do Christians even pray anymore?  Only the fundamentalists pray today.  Maybe Nietzsche was right when he said Jesus Christ was the only Christian that ever lived, and he was Jewish.  This is, of course, if he did exist, and there is no evidence to suggest he did. 

16th December 2012

Catholicism

Today it is considered decent to be a Catholic, as it is considered decent to be a Jew, a Christian and so forth. Like all these other fairy-tale religions, Catholics preach nonsense by very frivolous people. A clear distinction must be made from the outset: these frivolous people I speak of are not the general population, here I speak of figures of authority. The people on their pedestal tell impressionable and vulnerable people how to think.  It is fascinating to ponder the following: if child abuse were met with total impunity, would priests admit to such things in their speeches?  Well, it is true if you do want to sexually abuse a small child and get away with it, become a Catholic priest. 

A statement like this is controversial; yet it should not be. As the priest, the Catholic priest who chooses not to abuse children, they still commit the ultimate crime: silence, and then go through huge lengths to cover the abuse up. They are clearly extremely angry and upset at their colleagues’ for one simple reason: they were caught.  Catholicism ought to be banned outright, and so ought all other sun-god worshipping religions.  Without that, people will never be free; men and women will never be free as long as you have these churches telling them how to think, what values they should have, on what is good and bad. They tell their faithful followers’ child abuse is bad...when done by others.  Only the Catholic Church has the authority to carry out such heinous crimes. 

The catholic priest knows what he says is perverted rubbish; they no longer even believe what they say.  Every catholic priest lies, that is a truism that everybody ought to know. In the 20th century, the Russians said, at least some of them did, “all power to the Soviets” (and not to people), these catholic priests, menaces of religion, would desire all power to be with the Catholics. They preach their obscene morality and tell everybody to practise it.  The people this wretched lot fear the most are not Muslims or Jews, or any other religious groups.  It is atheism they despise.  The reason is simple.  Atheism finds ultimate freedom in the individual, and allows them to think independently and for themselves. They do not have a guiding authority that tells people how to think, how to behave, how to act and so on.

These Catholic priests still rage against abortion. To have an abortion, is immoral, they say. Abortion is a very important issue, and at least to me, it seems puzzling why these Catholics have such zeal and passion against women’s desire to have the freedom to remove an unwanted foetus.  Is it necessary to force a woman to keep a baby she does not want?  What sort of people utter such garbled rubbish?  The potential parents’ maybe alcoholics, child abusers, drug dealers, violent lunatics and so forth. Any decent person would prefer the unborn child to remain unborn rather than live a life of total and utter misery. The victim of incest or rape by a stranger, who falls pregnant, what do they say? She should keep the baby and be done with it. These morals they preach are fit for the garbage bin of history.

Yet these Catholic priests do not hide their identity either. Indeed, they are not ashamed to be called a “Catholic priest”. How do these same priests feel when they see two men or women holding hands in the street?  With utter disgust and repugnance.  The Bible says so and so, so there therefore they must think it and practice it.  These priests take a strong disliking to the idea of marrying the same sex in their beloved churches.  These catholic priests are not only homophobic; they are also misogynistic and biased towards others in a vast manner.  

Mary Whitehouse, that staunch catholic, loathed homosexuality.  She also talked of homosexuality and its depiction on film and television, arguing that if they must partake in such sordid activity; let it be kept away from our sight. She was a Catholic, that is true, and with very perverse and obscene ideas on a number of issues. She would be well placed in modern-day America.  It comes to that issue once again: putting morality over art. These people do not like art because it frees people, but they lay the claim that they do not want it to corrupt society. In other words, people choose what they have an interest in not based on their likes but on their religion!  It is the “good book” which we ought to call evil; it teaches us how to think, how to feel, shapes our opinions and so forth

The catholic priest dedicates himself to subverting the public mind, and it has an enormous effect, just as the Rabbi does when he subverts the public mind, as is the same with an Imam. What do these wretches of authority have in common?  People, whoever they are, would struggle to name a female Imam.  Women outnumber the male population, but because these sun-god worshippers are so misogynistic, these women are nowhere to be seen. They must be kept away from positions of authority and power.  Yet people continue to take these religions seriously. 

Here comes the Shepard whipping his sheep, he whips him into frenzy; he does not stop whipping them until they go in the direction he orders them.  He is not happy until his orders are followed. The shepherd here resembles the Catholic priest that whips his docile followers into a crazed frenzy. Their personal views must be as perverse as his must; he will not be content until he has achieved this goal.  This is why the government, all governments are enthusiastic in getting people into church, what they despise is independent thinking. The church prevents freethinking, it also prevents intellectual freedom, and it does this by teaching perverse morality. They argue against atheism, and lay the claim it is the people of faith that give more of their hard-earned money to charity. 

This is an interesting argument, and I am keen to argue it further.  Let us give these pretentious moralists the benefit and say it is true what they say, that these lost souls give more to charity than freethinkers, well, why is this?  It is not because they are more altruistic, it is because they are told to do it.  It is not a question of them caring for the suffering in the world, because they are only required to do it through religious teachings, and they will do it, that is all. They do not give because, as is often said, people of faith are more predisposed to give to charity because they are more charitable than atheists, that is false. 

On the other hand, atheists give to charities, volunteer groups and NGOs, because they want to, not because some oppressive and tyrannical religious text tells them to do so. They have the freedom to do this. They have the freedom to decide, sun-god worshippers, so it seems, have no freedom where this is concerned, they think they are free but they are not. They will only be partially free when they shake of the shackles.  These people must join a group or organisation, they must!  The government, the church, figures of authority are terrified of people shaking off repressive authority, because while they are part of these groups, their thoughts are controlled, and they will not get funny and suspicious ideas about criticising the government, outside the strict narrow framework that is permitted, anything beyond that and grave levels of concern are shown. 

It is rather disgraceful to have these rather large Catholic churches when thousands of men and women and even children are living rough on the streets.  What ought to happen is these churches should be turned into homes for the homeless.  Any decent society would do this.  If a Catholic wishes to prey they can do it in the luxury of their own home. They should be content at that. If Catholics must exist in society, at least they should not attend these places to worship their God, preventing the homeless of acquiring shelter.  They give to charity and yet are quite happy to see the homeless trowel the streets in awful conditions.  The followers of Catholicism or the followers of any religion are not able to think for themselves, so we must treat their views cautiously.  We must treat their views the same way we deal with a child’s.  In the meantime let us all seek the abolition of religion and church.

1st January 2013